PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1790 |
Memory | 28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 09 '22 at 08:00 |
Run Duration | 270 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
66%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
90.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 318 308 308 303 302 MB/s
|
159%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drevo X1 pro 64G 64GB
52GB free
Firmware: Q0303B
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 209 212 212 213 210 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
583GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 28 27 24 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 621x |
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 159x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 108x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 101x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 72x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |