Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 115 55% 87.5 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 162 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000 (PHDGD IvyDrive 3.0) 121 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 064B) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.33 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB 6,527 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 146 114 139 111 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 327 Write 120 Mixed 290 SusWrite 132 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 28.4 102% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 199 173% 254 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Buffalo (Formerly Melco) 2x2GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.5% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 17.9 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.6 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	400x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	206x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	66x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,609 samples	52x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 25%, 3,468 samples	23x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	23x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16