Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191227
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 10:47
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 736
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.6% Below average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 49.9
47% 54.6 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 0.2
23% 31.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 480GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 380 9.5 8.3 9.2 9.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 416
Write 110
Mixed 407
SusWrite 134
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 40.6
142% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 217
188% 275 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
228GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 90 91 89 85 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 100
Mixed 58
SusWrite 86.9
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
846GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 135 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69% Good
Read 134
Write 143
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 138
156% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 69%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback