Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211113
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	May 25 '22 at 05:27
Run Duration	320 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$263 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 88 1-Core 133 2-Core 268 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 667 72% 572 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 170 Parallax 169 134% 168 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 148 Splatting 126 122% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 1096 1793 1926 1922 1917 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	334% Outstanding	Read 2,128 Write 2,077 Mixed 1,463 SusWrite 1,625 410% 1,823 MB/s	4K Read 63.7 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 87.5 290% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1533 DQ Write 1,143 DQ Mixed 1330 996% 1,335 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 334% Great: 435%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 357GB free Firmware: GX0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 124 120 122 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 113 Write 130 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 122 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.5 198% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 104GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 101 102 101 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 173 Write 149 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 100 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 66GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 128 129 129 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 122 Write 111 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 128 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 151GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 108 108 105 105 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 77.8 Write 133 Mixed 72 SusWrite 105 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 221GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 165 166 166 167 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 132 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 164 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 113%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 101GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 41 41 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 108 Write 80.4 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 41.4 90% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 74%
Fantom External HDD 8TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 185GB free, PID b565 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 117 123 129 127 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 53.6 Write 118 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 121 128% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 55%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 165GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 38 38 38 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 99.7 Write 98.5 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 39.2 97% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 53%
FD Fantom 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 50 51 50 51 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.7% Average	Read 145 Write 123 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 50.8 121% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.7 165% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 267GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 135 135 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 70 SusWrite 135 142% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 26.2 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 21.1 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	349x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	68x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	73x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $862

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16