Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 136% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	13.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 83.5 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 673 68% 553 Pts	64-Core 805 50% 805 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Gigabyte(1458 4087) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	193% Outstanding	Lighting 278 Reflection 256 Parallax 293 226% 276 fps	MRender 322 Gravity 241 Splatting 179 194% 247 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 502GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 984 1083 1082 1057 1066 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 2,130 Write 1,929 Mixed 1,440 SusWrite 1,054 367% 1,638 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 99.3 4K Mixed 61.2 200% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,081 DQ Write 800 DQ Mixed 944 704% 941 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 15GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 413 Write 452 Mixed 359 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 35 126% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 292GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 89 89 85 83 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 90.5 Mixed 42 SusWrite 84.9 57% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 20.3 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 19.1 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	203x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $557

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16