Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110N
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110N-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 184
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 263
38% 277 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.7
6% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 58 82 110 87 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 12.5
Write 87.3
Mixed 11
SusWrite 80
34% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 15.7
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110N-CF Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback