Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon (Cascadelake) 51 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	62% Good	Memory 68 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 168 61% 107 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 334 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 129 129 130 132 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 416 Write 200 Mixed 245 SusWrite 135 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 7.2 30% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 11GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 10GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.36% Terrible	Read 49.1 Write 49.8 Mixed 70.9 SusWrite 47.7 12% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.9 4% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 9%
Qemu HARDDISK 11GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 10GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.45% Terrible	Read 50 Write 48.8 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 47.7 12% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2 5% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.45% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.1% Above average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 18.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 118%

UFO

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 112%

UFO

CPU
Xeon (Cascadelake)IntelBench 62%, 31 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2640 v4IntelBench 69%, 647 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
Hat VirtIO 86GBRedBench 49%, 89 samples	1x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $550