Asus K43SD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K43SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K43SD
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 50.2
2-Core 92
47% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 134
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1652) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 34 31 23 33 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 50
Write 51.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 34.1
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 50%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 16GB
16GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 11 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 12
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 9.6
18% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K43SD Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K43SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback