Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar TA75M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar TA75M (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '22 at 04:49
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 55.7 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 100 41% 68.4 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 166 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Biostar(1565 1707) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.56% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 6.6 4% 6.1 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 6.3 5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.56% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 207GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 145 144 147 147 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 153 Write 123 Mixed 38 SusWrite 144 83% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS545032B9SA02 320GB 537 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 199GB free Firmware: PB3AC60W SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 68 69 70 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 70.6 Write 63.4 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 67.9 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.6 7.2 8.3 7.4 9 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 6 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 7.5 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905402-413.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905402-413.A00LF 12GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 10.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.4 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TA75M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA75M

CPU
A8-3850 APUAMD $75Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples	1x
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	1x

SSD
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x
SSD 256GB256gbBench 90%, 916 samples	1x
SSD 120GBTammuzBench 52%, 312 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 6,123 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $274

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370