Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A75-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 20:33
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 74.2
34% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 129
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 40
34% 42.6 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.5
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: N191129a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 34 25 40 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.75% Terrible
Read 87.8
Write 132
Mixed 128
SusWrite 34.5
22% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.7
11% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$32
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 28 28 14 28 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 77
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 24.5
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
356GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 118 116 116 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 101
Write 113
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 115
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 16GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V EVO Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback