Today's hottest deals

Asus G750JH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G750JH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JH
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 14:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 461
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780M
Asus(1043 213E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 849 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 28.9
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 37.9
24% 31.8 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 28.6
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC81605
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 391
Mixed 272
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 32
115% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 177
166% 261 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
123GB free
Firmware: JF4OA200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 65
Mixed 39
SusWrite 67.3
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 9905428-155.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JH Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G750JH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback