_com1_ NBINF-O5-5R7R6N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
System_com1_ NBINF-O5-5R7R6N  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard GM5ZN0O
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 14:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 307
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,118
103% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,276
79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1111) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 100
Reflection 100
Parallax 100
82% 100 fps
Splatting 86.4
89% 86.4 fps
Poor: 67% Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
906GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1467 1472 1477 1490 1582 1564 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 1,504
Mixed 1,279
SusWrite 1,508
322% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 55.2
178% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 846
637% 858 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 242%
Great: 251%
Kingston SNVS1000GB 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1466 1486 1503 1310 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 188
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 1,154
144% 654 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 2.8
61% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 30.6
95% 224 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 151%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Adata 32GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 29.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 27.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NBINF-O5-5R7R6N Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: _com1_ NBINF-O5-5R7R6N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback