Lenovo 20VX00DCUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20VX00DCUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20VX00DCUS
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 00:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 313
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 722
78% 617 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 22CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 28.9
20% 26.1 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 20.8
21% 26 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,123
Write 1,667
Mixed 1,345
380% 1,712 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 70.9
236% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 988
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 726
524% 694 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 28.3
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 20.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20VX00DCUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20VX00DCUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback