Average Bench: 14.1% (252nd of 713)

Based on 144,774 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 9A49 Model: Intel(R) Iris(R) Xe Graphics

Terrible average bench

The Intel Iris Xe averaged 85.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 17.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 23.2fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Iris Xe is just 11.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Iris Xe performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 23.9fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 20.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 144,774 samples)
Min Avg Max
10 Lighting 17.3 23.9
9.2 Reflection 23.9 67
12.2 Parallax 20.8 28.4
14.1% 20.6 fps
Min Avg Max
8.8 MRender 16.2 24
11.8 Gravity 23.2 34.6
1 Splatting 13.7 20.5
14.2% 17.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 87F7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 27.1
18% 25.3 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 22.7
21% 26 fps
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 21.5
16% 20.8 fps
MRender 17.7
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 15.7
16% 19.5 fps
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 22.8
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 16.3
15% 17.9 fps
Asus(1043 1482) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 24
16% 20.2 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.5 fps
HP(103C 880D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 20.6
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 14.4
14% 16.7 fps
Dell(1028 0991) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 15.9
10% 15.8 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 13.4
12% 15.3 fps
HP(103C 880D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.6
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 5
5% 6.6 fps
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 8
5% 7.1 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 5
5% 5.87 fps
Dell(1028 0A03) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.57 fps
144,774 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,044,994 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 144,774 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 5088) 4% 14% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 3% 14% ± 3%
Acer(1025 1464) 3% 14% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3A5B) 3% 14% ± 4%
Microsoft(1414 0046) 3% 15% ± 3%
HP(103C 87FE) 3% 13% ± 2%
HP(103C 881D) 2% 12% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A21) 2% 13% ± 4%
Asus(1043 16E2) 2% 18% ± 2%
Acer(1025 1468) 2% 13% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 2% 17% ± 3%
Asus(1043 15CC) 2% 13% ± 4%
Dell(1028 0A36) 2% 15% ± 4%
Asus(1043 13BC) 1% 16% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A25) 1% 13% ± 3%
Microsoft(1414 0045) 1% 18% ± 2%
HP(103C 880D) 1% 13% ± 2%
Quanta(152D 127D) 1% 15% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0991) 1% 14% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0A20) 1% 12% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3F19) 1% 14% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 22C9) 1% 16% ± 4%
Asus(1043 160C) 1% 19% ± 1%
Device(1E50 800D) 1% 16% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1362) 1% 13% ± 3%
Asus(1043 1C22) 1% 14% ± 5%
HP(103C 87C9) 1% 14% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0AB0) 1% 12% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F18) 1% 12% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0ADB) 1% 12% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0B20) 1% 11% ± 3%
Device(1D72 2039) 1% 13% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 5089) 1% 12% ± 5%
Legend(17AA 3F9D) 1% 15% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 22D1) 1% 16% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F89) 1% 16% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 22D5) 1% 16% ± 5%
HP(103C 88BA) 1% 14% ± 4%
Acer(1025 1545) 1% 15% ± 2%
HP(103C 87E1) 1% 12% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A22) 1% 14% ± 6%
Dell(1028 0A23) 1% 13% ± 1%
HP(103C 87CB) 1% 15% ± 2%
HP(103C 8846) 1% 15% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 508F) 1% 15% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3801) 1% 14% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 22CB) 1% 19% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3F9B) 1% 13% ± 2%
Sanyo(144D C195) 1% 15% ± 1%
Intel(8086 3002) 1% 17% ± 3%
Send price feedback
Typical Iris Xe Builds (Compare 3,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 5420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Iris Xe systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Disliked

6 days ago.

Comment 

This is currently Intel's most powerful GPU. If you want to play light or medium games on an Intel-based laptop or desktop, this is the one you should look for. Compare to the same class AMD Vega11, Xe has slightly better performance than Vega11. For now, I was an Intel Iris G4 user, but upgrading to Xe is a whole new world. If you are a UHD user, upgrading to iris Xe is highly recommended.—Jan '21


Average

6 days ago.

gta v 70 fps i7 12700h processor

Comment 

Great performer making integrated graphics is a tough job when you compare with mx330 or gt 1030 graphics its a beast—Mar '21


Excellent

2 months ago.

Its a cheap graphic card with a normal speed ... Its a good option for people who want to play normal games


Poor

1 month ago.

Basically overkill with no use because of RTX 3090ti


Excellent

26 days ago.

Perfect for a home pc, it don´t need refrigeration and can be at 100% without getting high temperatures, recomended to someone who is not asking for too much and want to have someting that don´t give him problems.


Good

3 months ago.

Its the best performance intrgrated gpu i've ever had, it can run most games on medium settings, its better than some dedicated entry level gpus from nvidia


Average

5 months ago.

Its good for mid range laptops, but it is lacking in power.


Poor

1 day ago.

cheap and comes with 11th and 12th gen chips, better than previous versions of integrated graphics


Excellent

2 months ago.

I like it because i use and it is more modern


Excellent

4 months ago.

very best budget gpu to be honest


Excellent

2 years ago.

2020 Intel Iris Plus iGPU. Come with 4 type. Tiger lake CPU (G7 series) will have 96 and 80 Xe. Rocket lake CPU will have 32 and 24 Xe. Able to handle most of the light games and mobile games using Android emulator such as BlueStacks. Able to run most of the mobile games with over 120fps. 60fps is idle. Modern games will run at 80~120fps. Modern 3D games will run at 60~100fps. At FHD, 100~fps with potato, 60~80 with medium, 50~60 with high, and 30~40fps with very high. Ultra setting using DLSS, RT, or 4K will not work. Overall, high-end non-gaming ultrabook which comes with Xe will able to fly thru every everyday tasking. Remember, this is not a gaming GPU.


Average

7 months ago.

Look how far we've come!


Excellent

2 years ago.

A fantastic igpu on my i7 1185g7. I got the 96 version on my i7 and it performs exceptionally well given its power efficiency and the fact that it is an igpu. Best Intel igpu so far. Its performance is probably similar to a gtx 1050 thus very capable for light gaming or doing graphical work.


Good

3 years ago.

Twice as fast compared to the predecessor UHD 630 & slightly faster compared to the mx250.


Poor

11 days ago.

trash


Your
opinion?
713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12400F $148Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback