Average Bench: 16.9% (205th of 683)

Based on 129,384 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 9A49 Model: Intel(R) Iris(R) Xe Graphics

Terrible average bench

The Intel Iris Xe averaged 83.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 24.3fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 19.4fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Iris Xe is just 13.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Iris Xe performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 29.3fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 23.2fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 129,384 samples)
Min Avg Max
11.3 Lighting 19.4 25.6
12.1 Reflection 29.3 80.2
13.8 Parallax 23.2 30.3
15.7% 24 fps
Min Avg Max
1 MRender 17 24.9
1 Gravity 24.3 36.4
0.2 Splatting 13.2 21.7
18.6% 18.1 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 0A20) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 29.2
19% 24.9 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 20.4
26% 24.9 fps
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 24.1
16% 19.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 27.9
Splatting 16.2
21% 20.1 fps
Dell(1028 0A36) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 23.5
15% 20.7 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 22.8
21% 24.2 fps
HP(103C 8850) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Lighting 16
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 19.1
13% 19.4 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 13.6
17% 17 fps
HP(103C 883C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1218
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 0.3
11% 9.8 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 0.2
15% 10.7 fps
HP(103C 89DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 12
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 8.6
10% 10.3 fps
Dell(1028 0A42) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 8.5
9% 8.1 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 5.1
8% 7.97 fps
Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 6.2
8% 8.13 fps
Quanta(152D 1346) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 12.3
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
129,384 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 54,218,495 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 129,384 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 3A5B) 4% 18% ± 4%
Microsoft(1414 0046) 3% 18% ± 4%
Asus(1043 16E2) 3% 20% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 2% 18% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1C22) 2% 17% ± 4%
Dell(1028 0A20) 2% 17% ± 4%
HP(103C 87FE) 2% 17% ± 2%
Acer(1025 1468) 2% 16% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 5088) 2% 17% ± 5%
Dell(1028 0AB0) 1% 17% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1% 16% ± 5%
Microsoft(1414 0045) 1% 20% ± 3%
Asus(1043 160C) 1% 23% ± 1%
HP(103C 881D) 1% 14% ± 3%
Asus(1043 15CC) 1% 16% ± 3%
Acer(1025 1464) 1% 14% ± 4%
Acer(1025 1545) 1% 16% ± 4%
Intel(8086 3004) 1% 22% ± 2%
Quanta(152D 127D) 1% 12% ± 4%
Dell(1028 0A25) 1% 16% ± 4%
MSI(1462 12FA) 1% 18% ± 6%
Acer(1025 149D) 1% 17% ± 6%
Legend(17AA 3801) 1% 13% ± 3%
HP(103C 881E) 1% 14% ± 3%
Intel(8086 3002) 1% 19% ± 2%
Acer(1025 152F) 1% 14% ± 4%
HP(103C 880D) 1% 15% ± 4%
Legend(17AA 3749) 1% 11% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1452) 1% 17% ± 5%
HP(103C 87E1) 1% 17% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F19) 1% 17% ± 5%
Legend(17AA 3F17) 1% 15% ± 5%
Dell(1028 0A06) 1% 14% ± 4%
Device(1E50 800D) 1% 18% ± 5%
HP(103C 89B7) 1% 14% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0991) 1% 19% ± 4%
Dell(1028 0A86) 1% 19% ± 4%
HP(103C 88E5) 1% 19% ± 2%
HP(103C 8846) 1% 17% ± 3%
Microsoft(1414 0044) 1% 16% ± 4%
HP(103C 87FD) 1% 14% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0A02) 1% 12% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 22C9) 1% 21% ± 3%
Asus(1043 1362) 1% 17% ± 3%
HP(103C 8709) 1% 16% ± 5%
HP(103C 89BC) 1% 18% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A21) 1% 15% ± 4%
Asus(1043 1432) 1% 16% ± 3%
HP(103C 883C) 1% 15% ± 1%
Dell(1028 09DD) 1% 14% ± 4%
Send price feedback
Typical Iris Xe Builds (Compare 5,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Iris Xe systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

5 days ago.

cuz i have it and im too poor to afford a new one


Liked

7 days ago.

Comment 

This is currently Intel's most powerful GPU. If you want to play light or medium games on an Intel-based laptop or desktop, this is the one you should look for. Compare to the same class AMD Vega11, Xe has slightly better performance than Vega11. For now, I was an Intel Iris G4 user, but upgrading to Xe is a whole new world. If you are a UHD user, upgrading to iris Xe is highly recommended.—Jan '21


Liked

13 hrs ago.

Comment 

Great performer making integrated graphics is a tough job when you compare with mx330 or gt 1030 graphics its a beast—Mar '21


Excellent

5 days ago.

great graphic card cheap and effecitve


Average

18 days ago.

It ain't much, but it'll get your laptop playing some alright games with an alright FPS.


Excellent

1 month ago.

Perfect for a home pc, it don´t need refrigeration and can be at 100% without getting high temperatures, recomended to someone who is not asking for too much and want to have someting that don´t give him problems.


Excellent

1 month ago.

Basically overkill with no use because of RTX 3090ti


Terrible

7 months ago.

Its the best performance intrgrated gpu i've ever had, it can run most games on medium settings, its better than some dedicated entry level gpus from nvidia


Good

6 days ago.


Excellent

14 months ago.

2020 Intel Iris Plus iGPU. Come with 4 type. Tiger lake CPU (G7 series) will have 96 and 80 Xe. Rocket lake CPU will have 32 and 24 Xe. Able to handle most of the light games and mobile games using Android emulator such as BlueStacks. Able to run most of the mobile games with over 120fps. 60fps is idle. Modern games will run at 80~120fps. Modern 3D games will run at 60~100fps. At FHD, 100~fps with potato, 60~80 with medium, 50~60 with high, and 30~40fps with very high. Ultra setting using DLSS, RT, or 4K will not work. Overall, high-end non-gaming ultrabook which comes with Xe will able to fly thru every everyday tasking. Remember, this is not a gaming GPU.


Good

4 months ago.

The 96eu version is very capable for integrated graphics, drivers are questionnable but they receive fixes fairly often. You can even play cyberpunk 2077 and elden ring on that thing!


Excellent

11 months ago.

A fantastic igpu on my i7 1185g7. I got the 96 version on my i7 and it performs exceptionally well given its power efficiency and the fact that it is an igpu. Best Intel igpu so far. Its performance is probably similar to a gtx 1050 thus very capable for light gaming or doing graphical work.


Good

17 months ago.

Twice as fast compared to the predecessor UHD 630 & slightly faster compared to the mx250.


Your
opinion?
683 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback