Average Bench: 14.1% (255th of 715)

Based on 144,774 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 9A49 Model: Intel(R) Iris(R) Xe Graphics

Terrible average bench

The Intel Iris Xe averaged 85.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 17.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 23.2fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Iris Xe is just 11.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Iris Xe performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 23.9fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 20.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 144,774 samples)
Min Avg Max
10 Lighting 17.3 23.9
9.2 Reflection 23.9 67
12.2 Parallax 20.8 28.4
14.1% 20.6 fps
Min Avg Max
8.8 MRender 16.2 24
11.8 Gravity 23.2 34.6
1 Splatting 13.7 20.5
14.2% 17.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Legend(17AA 3F88) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 19.3
19% 20.9 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 15.7
15% 19.1 fps
MSI(1462 12FA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 28
Parallax 32.6
18% 27.4 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 0.2
14% 19.7 fps
Legend(17AA 5088) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5592
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 22.3
16% 21 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 16
16% 19.6 fps
Legend(17AA 3F92) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 29.2
20% 26.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 1.7
8% 10.8 fps
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 23.2
16% 21.6 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 15.8
15% 18.9 fps
Dell(1028 0A23) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 24.4
15% 21.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 15.4
14% 17.9 fps
HP(103C 8847) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5388
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 22
Parallax 19.2
12% 18.6 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.9 fps
Asus(1043 1262) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5592
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 16.3
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 11.5
12% 14.9 fps
Dell(1028 0AB0) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.1
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 2.8
3% 3.63 fps
144,774 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,016,989 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 144,774 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 5088) 4% 14% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 3% 14% ± 3%
Acer(1025 1464) 3% 14% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3A5B) 3% 14% ± 4%
Microsoft(1414 0046) 3% 15% ± 3%
HP(103C 87FE) 3% 13% ± 2%
HP(103C 881D) 2% 12% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A21) 2% 13% ± 4%
Asus(1043 16E2) 2% 18% ± 2%
Acer(1025 1468) 2% 13% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 2% 17% ± 3%
Asus(1043 15CC) 2% 13% ± 4%
Dell(1028 0A36) 2% 15% ± 4%
Asus(1043 13BC) 1% 16% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A25) 1% 13% ± 3%
Microsoft(1414 0045) 1% 18% ± 2%
HP(103C 880D) 1% 13% ± 2%
Quanta(152D 127D) 1% 15% ± 1%
Dell(1028 0991) 1% 14% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0A20) 1% 12% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3F19) 1% 14% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 22C9) 1% 16% ± 4%
Asus(1043 160C) 1% 19% ± 1%
Device(1E50 800D) 1% 16% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1362) 1% 13% ± 3%
Asus(1043 1C22) 1% 14% ± 5%
HP(103C 87C9) 1% 14% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0AB0) 1% 12% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F18) 1% 12% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0ADB) 1% 12% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0B20) 1% 11% ± 3%
Device(1D72 2039) 1% 13% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 5089) 1% 12% ± 5%
Legend(17AA 3F9D) 1% 15% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 22D1) 1% 16% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 3F89) 1% 16% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 22D5) 1% 16% ± 5%
HP(103C 88BA) 1% 14% ± 4%
Acer(1025 1545) 1% 15% ± 2%
HP(103C 87E1) 1% 12% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0A22) 1% 14% ± 6%
Dell(1028 0A23) 1% 13% ± 1%
HP(103C 87CB) 1% 15% ± 2%
HP(103C 8846) 1% 15% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 508F) 1% 15% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3801) 1% 14% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 22CB) 1% 19% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 3F9B) 1% 13% ± 2%
Sanyo(144D C195) 1% 15% ± 1%
Intel(8086 3002) 1% 17% ± 3%
Send price feedback
Typical Iris Xe Builds (Compare 3,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 5420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Iris Xe systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

2 months ago.

Comment 

This is currently Intel's most powerful GPU. If you want to play light or medium games on an Intel-based laptop or desktop, this is the one you should look for. Compare to the same class AMD Vega11, Xe has slightly better performance than Vega11. For now, I was an Intel Iris G4 user, but upgrading to Xe is a whole new world. If you are a UHD user, upgrading to iris Xe is highly recommended.—Jan '21


Liked

2 days ago.

Comment 

Great performer making integrated graphics is a tough job when you compare with mx330 or gt 1030 graphics its a beast—Mar '21


Good

1 month ago.

Its a cheap graphic card with a normal speed ... Its a good option for people who want to play normal games


Good

26 days ago.

Cant keep up with the newer basic games such as smite 2 and stuggles with genshin impact on low settings. its decent for roblox but other than that NO


Average

20 days ago.

its not good for competitve gaming but its great if ur the average roblox or minecraft player


Good

3 months ago.

Perfect for a home pc, it don´t need refrigeration and can be at 100% without getting high temperatures, recomended to someone who is not asking for too much and want to have someting that don´t give him problems.


Poor

26 days ago.

Its the best performance intrgrated gpu i've ever had, it can run most games on medium settings, its better than some dedicated entry level gpus from nvidia


Average

10 months ago.

Its good for mid range laptops, but it is lacking in power.


Excellent

1 month ago.

have a intel mac running windows so yeah


Excellent

3 months ago.

cheap and comes with 11th and 12th gen chips, better than previous versions of integrated graphics


Good

1 month ago.

It does well for the most part. obviously this igpu cant play the most modern demanding games but it can still play games like minecraft, almost all gta games, most nfs games (non modern) and many other classic games


Excellent

22 days ago.

I like it because i use and it is more modern


Excellent

9 months ago.

very best budget gpu to be honest


Excellent

3 years ago.

2020 Intel Iris Plus iGPU. Come with 4 type. Tiger lake CPU (G7 series) will have 96 and 80 Xe. Rocket lake CPU will have 32 and 24 Xe. Able to handle most of the light games and mobile games using Android emulator such as BlueStacks. Able to run most of the mobile games with over 120fps. 60fps is idle. Modern games will run at 80~120fps. Modern 3D games will run at 60~100fps. At FHD, 100~fps with potato, 60~80 with medium, 50~60 with high, and 30~40fps with very high. Ultra setting using DLSS, RT, or 4K will not work. Overall, high-end non-gaming ultrabook which comes with Xe will able to fly thru every everyday tasking. Remember, this is not a gaming GPU.


Average

12 months ago.

Look how far we've come!


Excellent

2 years ago.

A fantastic igpu on my i7 1185g7. I got the 96 version on my i7 and it performs exceptionally well given its power efficiency and the fact that it is an igpu. Best Intel igpu so far. Its performance is probably similar to a gtx 1050 thus very capable for light gaming or doing graphical work.


Good

3 years ago.

Twice as fast compared to the predecessor UHD 630 & slightly faster compared to the mx250.


Poor

5 months ago.

trash


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback