Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 134 58% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 373 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1425 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.1% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 90.5 54% 74.3 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 76.6 Splatting 49.6 52% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 96 90 101 104 101 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.5% Average	Read 206 Write 95 Mixed 191 SusWrite 99.7 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 15.8 70% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 27.5 56% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 86%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB 7,915 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 83GB free Firmware: 04.04V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 104 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 99 Write 103 Mixed 66 SusWrite 105 69% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD186D.M16 2x8GB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.4% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.1 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples	2x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	1x
RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 2,171 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $229