ADD TO PC
BUILD

Default EMB-Q170A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Default EMB-Q170A (all builds)
Motherboard	Default Default string
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160926
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 09:18
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500TE 227 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 195 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 390 52% 388 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 6324) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.91 4% 4.84 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.22 5% 5.55 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -123909806489586 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 35 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (B7) Unknown 100 100 8 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 28 32 81606475804 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6404 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 49 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6404 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6399 (F9) Unknown 100 100 229	53% Above average	Read 480 Write 123 Mixed 203 58% 269 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 10.4 73% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 10.3 38% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B2GF0.AF00B 1x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11.4 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback