Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	224GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 224GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	216.9 GB free of 224 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '22 at 23:38
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 379 User benchmarks, average bench 67% None, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 203 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 787 70% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,558 96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 159 148 155 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 521 Write 141 Mixed 246 SusWrite 160 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 19.4 103% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 14 DQ Mixed 25.7 39% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1.5TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 337 310 266 302 344 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 514 Write 513 Mixed 523 SusWrite 318 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 28.3 86% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 191 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 64GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 0, 0, 0 MHz 1024, 32767, 32767 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 57.1 MC Write 50.5 MC Mixed 45.9 146% 51.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 218%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325