Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HEB_FX706HEB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HEB_FX706HEB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HEB
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 22:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 51.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 269
80% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 766
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 5.3
4% 28.6 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 6.8
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 191 687 721 932 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,222
Write 661
Mixed 767
SusWrite 557
178% 802 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 26.4
121% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 402
281% 358 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 134%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HEB_FX706HEB Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HEB_FX706HEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback