Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$92
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 338
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11E6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 14.6
13% 13.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 515 481 536 547 831 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 317
Write 453
Mixed 620
SusWrite 612
114% 501 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 13.1
78% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 445
344% 475 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 213%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
122GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 329 318 357 364 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 225
Write 211
Mixed 235
SusWrite 340
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 10.3
33% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 192
140% 182 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$52
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 24
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 75 27" 1280 720 HPN3700 HP M27ha
Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback