Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$266 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 55.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 275 81% 157 Pts	4-Core 551 8-Core 287 62% 419 Pts	64-Core 638 40% 638 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 360 9 User benchmarks, average bench 16% PwrHis(1787 5826) ≥ 4GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 14.3 Reflection 4.8 Parallax 2.5 12% 7.2 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 15.9 11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 862 849 537 56 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,362 Write 864 Mixed 809 SusWrite 545 199% 895 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 62.2 222% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 374 DQ Mixed 187 186% 297 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron GMA16G4SCL196P-26 2x16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.5% Good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 21 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	495x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	486x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	466x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,379x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	494x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	357x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87