Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 16:04
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 179
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 416
46% 360 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.1% Good
Lighting 92
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 43.2
75% 64.5 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 49.4
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 318 330 316 316 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 421
Write 367
Mixed 309
SusWrite 314
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 31.3
97% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 258
211% 302 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 158 157 161 156 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 385
Write 388
Mixed 313
SusWrite 181
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 34.7
119% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 354
263% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
381GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 162 162 154 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 47.5
Write 74.4
SusWrite 160
67% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
806GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 10.1
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
120GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 14.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 10.3
27% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
218GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 27.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 10.2
29% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback