Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 765
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 957
59% 957 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 51.3
44% 53.9 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 45.6
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,329
Write 2,232
Mixed 2151
500% 2,237 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 70.9
229% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 769
578% 776 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
313GB free
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 50 50 75 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41% Average
Read 478
Write 432
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 110
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 39.8
37% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
449GB free
Firmware: AM0P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 94
Write 101
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 106
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG8GX4M1E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 7,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback