Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienta_CFS
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 08:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 132
55% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 431
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 292 253 272 270 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,770
Write 549
Mixed 247
SusWrite 288
154% 714 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 40.9
139% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 644
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 420
356% 523 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 157%
Great: 157%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
729GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 130 130 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 130
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-51 Builds (Compare 3,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback