Asus X555LNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAsus X555LNB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LNB
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 13:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 156
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 223
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 237A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6.5
4% 7.1 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SE900G 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 258 236 147 206 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 309
Write 336
Mixed 303
SusWrite 234
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 17.8
62% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 108
82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 93%
Adata SC685 500GB
325GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 279 138 85 119 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 298
Write 314
Mixed 225
SusWrite 159
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 25.1
75% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 9905417-067.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LNB Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback