Today's hottest deals

Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 08:34
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 895
81% 680 Pts
64-Core 2,696
167% 2,696 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 254
Parallax 314
226% 282 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 238
Splatting 175
191% 242 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 192%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 119 161 160 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 150
Write 198
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 142
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 20%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1552 1444 1459 1564 1558 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,853
Write 1,815
Mixed 1,969
SusWrite 1,506
403% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 41.9
138% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 314
251% 363 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 226%
Great: 477%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
74GB free
Firmware: SS0411BB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 781 744 782 814 754 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,722
Write 1,141
Mixed 134
SusWrite 824
211% 955 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 48.4
157% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 498
371% 497 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 190%
Great: 370%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1709 1735 1522 1300 1303 1348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 1,564
Mixed 1,285
SusWrite 1,486
344% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 52.2
163% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 504
371% 493 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 235%
Great: 410%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
122GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 363 361 362 367 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 400
Write 336
Mixed 276
SusWrite 364
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 25.4
91% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 118
112% 175 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 116%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 170 169 166 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 163
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 163
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
400% 3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 104%
LD-CT CT 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2.3 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 7
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 2.5
9% 7.32 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GFX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 35.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 25.6
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,866
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback