Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-k9
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 17:13
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 33.9
2-Core 67.6
36% 54 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 208
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 48.5
Parallax 39.3
23% 38.8 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 33
Splatting 26.6
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 171 283 117 77 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 1,112
Write 947
Mixed 744
SusWrite 191
167% 748 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 19.1
96% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 206
153% 204 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 234%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
70GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 59.7
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 57.5
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4 8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback