Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4157WLT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4157WLT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory6.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 10:48
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 141
56% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 429
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 101
Parallax 99.6
84% 101 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 88.4
83% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 201 212 211 210 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 229
Write 218
Mixed 174
SusWrite 208
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 23.4
81% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 166
133% 186 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB
848GB free
Firmware: G009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 76 78 79 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 69.6
Write 58.7
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 79.4
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$14
191GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 103 60 81 69 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 114
Write 84.8
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 77.8
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
157GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 84 92 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 111
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 105
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6
14% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4157WLT Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 4157WLT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback