Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 845E
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 22:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 345
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 845E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 38.1
32% 39 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 26.7
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solid 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 9.5 291 382 74 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 474
Write 340
Mixed 305
SusWrite 130
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 0.4
19% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 88%
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: X6103006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 97 111 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 449
Write 444
Mixed 302
SusWrite 120
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 36.2
150% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 260
193% 258 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 23.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.8
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback