Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 01:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 183
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 350
48% 353 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 26.4
16% 23.2 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 21.5
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 136 196 192 150 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 492
Write 427
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 215
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 26.4
78% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 49.3
103% 206 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
767GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 117
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLH-8G Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $591
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback