Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 58.7 2-Core 97.5 45% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 120 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.2 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0011LVM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Read 2.8 Write 8 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 4.2 3% 4.68 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	452x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	40x
GeForce GT 635MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,113 samples	30x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	21x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	14x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	86x
RMT3150ED58E8W1600 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 6GBUnknownBench 44%, 366 samples	30x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	28x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $52