Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 621
68% 535 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 6.6
5% 15 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 953 930 534 592 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 793
Write 866
Mixed 766
SusWrite 732
178% 789 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 41.2
140% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 635
482% 637 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 148%
Great: 181%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
894GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 127 128 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 114
Write 91.3
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 124
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.8
371% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 24.2
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback