Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '22 at 03:01
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 111 2-Core 207 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 553 56% 454 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.9 Reflection 16 Parallax 11.1 11% 13.7 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 14.7 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 305 325 322 324 319 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 342 Write 324 Mixed 301 SusWrite 311 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 29.5 95% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 203 156% 211 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 98GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 176 181 181 181 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 116 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 176 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5 8% 7.93 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	69x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	46x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	17x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,979 samples	6x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 52%, 2,501 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $539

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16