Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 215-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-52  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Taurus_IL
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 20:43
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
UC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 64
1-Core 103
2-Core 157
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 240
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1422) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.9
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNI-82A 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 297 295 295 307 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 719
Write 788
Mixed 728
SusWrite 320
144% 639 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 30.5
124% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 599
462% 631 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 186%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 12GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-52 Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback