Acer Swift SF314-41G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Strongbow_PK
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 18:08
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 72
2-Core 114
49% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 250
26% 209 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 540X
Acer(1025 137A) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.26
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.3% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 15.2
9% 15.3 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 14.9
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 291 284 283 282 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 761
Write 281
Mixed 349
SusWrite 282
92% 418 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 30.3
109% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 330
252% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 12GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-41G Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback