Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20160

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20160  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20160
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 11:53
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B960
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 44.5
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 54.2
31% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 53.6
8-Core 58.1
7% 55.8 Pts
64-Core 42.9
3% 42.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5003) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.7
0% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 180 47 63 196 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 253
Write 259
Mixed 200
SusWrite 143
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 11.5
49% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 99.8
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MK5065GSX 500GB-$59
69GB free
Firmware: GJ104E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 42 44 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 45.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 43.5
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 075D GR1600S364L11S/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20160 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback