Today's hottest deals

VIA EPIA-M920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardVIA EPIA-M920  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 22:50
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA QuadCore C4650@2.0GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 47.8
32% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 96
8-Core 95.4
13% 95.7 Pts
64-Core 92.8
6% 92.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
PNY(196E 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1602 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 20.2
16% 19.6 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 18.5
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 256GB-$48
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 151 191 201 214 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 241
Write 235
Mixed 209
SusWrite 194
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 21.5
72% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 63.2
80% 142 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.8
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPIA-M920 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: VIA EPIA-M920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback