Today's hottest deals

VIA EPIA-M920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardVIA EPIA-M920  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 04:13
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA QuadCore C4650@2.0GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 41.5
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 48.5
25% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 78
8-Core 81
11% 79.5 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Via/s3g C-645/640 GPU
Device(1106 3A01) 512MB
Driver: S3EDX9L_64.dll Ver. 10.18.16.308
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easystore 240GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 103 130 121 101 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 223
Write 197
Mixed 132
SusWrite 127
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 8
37% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 34.9
40% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 6.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.5
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.8
120% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPIA-M920 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: VIA EPIA-M920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback