Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1717 x 928 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 23:02
Run Duration491 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 23.1
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 39.6
19% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 49.8
8-Core 37.4
6% 43.6 Pts
64-Core 45.4
3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 35.6
21% 23.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 23
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 542
Write 382
Mixed 463
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 16.1
51% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 98.9
DQ Write 47
DQ Mixed 25.6
32% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 103%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 5GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 456
Write 285
Mixed 382
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 16.4
55% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 22
17% 23.3 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB 1x2GB
1 of 128 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 3.7
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.8
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 298
13% 298 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback