Eurocom Neptune 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEurocom Neptune 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM Neptune 2.0
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 11:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 44
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 157
52% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 390
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Graphics Device
Clevo(1558 7481) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 42.9
38% 44.6 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 46.5
Splatting 44.7
34% 41.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMLN256HCHP-000 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 199 207 209 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 230
Write 220
Mixed 169
SusWrite 207
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 27.2
94% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 166
131% 183 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 103 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.9
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 102
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 71%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
698GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 99 101 99 101 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 97.9
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G3S1339M.M16FN 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Neptune 2.0 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Neptune 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback