Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4005U 37,483 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 52.6 1-Core 31.6 2-Core 63 32% 49.1 Pts	4-Core 94.5 8-Core 96.9 13% 95.7 Pts	64-Core 99.2 6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 0A16) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.38% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 5.1 2% 3.23 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.6 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.38% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SWR256G-201II 256GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMP1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 78 76 71 61 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 297 Write 274 Mixed 232 SusWrite 91.9 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 18.2 66% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 178 136% 185 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MS301GNSA-CA3G1 1x8GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.6% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	5x

RAM
MS301GNSA-CA3G1 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 112 samples	3x
MS3512NSZ-CA3G1 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 530 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16