Today's hottest deals

Asrock MXM IPC-Q170-Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock MXM IPC-Q170-Q  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 20:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 628
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
MSI(1462 11C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1556 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 112
Parallax 106
85% 108 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 93.9
74% 89.6 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 149%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$139
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 1990 2275 2270 1492 1000 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2211
Write 2,007
Mixed 1,643
SusWrite 1,711
425% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 81.5
280% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,083
813% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 328%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27.1
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MXM IPC-Q170-Q Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock MXM IPC-Q170-Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback