Standard Standard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemStandard Standard  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 05 '22 at 22:52
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 99.1
42% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 330
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1147) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3430
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 1
1% 27.4 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 562 614 617 643 676 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 860
Mixed 869
SusWrite 623
195% 871 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 33.3
118% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 136
121% 188 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 129%
Great: 313%
MSI M470 1TB
527GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 582 633 638 665 701 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1009
Write 1,002
Mixed 980
SusWrite 645
205% 909 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 35
113% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 261
182% 235 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 125%
Great: 504%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 30.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Standard Standard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback