bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics8.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory23.9 GB free of 25.9922 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 02:12
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: 11th Gen Intel Core i7-1165G7
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 33.4
21% 31 Pts
4-Core 48.1
8-Core 44.9
6% 46.5 Pts
64-Core 41
2% 41 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 24.5
9% 15.9 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 79 99 56 184 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 366
Write 272
Mixed 314
SusWrite 136
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 9.9
32% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 82.1
DQ Write 60
DQ Mixed 71.8
53% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-256MB Virtual RAM VMW-128MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-32MB VMwar... 25GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192, 1024, 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 252
16% 252 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback