Today's hottest deals

Asus ET2311I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ET2311I  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ET2311I
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 09:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Memory 4.37
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 108
29% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 160
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 59 84 121 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 100
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate USB 2.0 Cable 240GB
194GB free, PID 5020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 11 33 15 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 32.7
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 24.4
45% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 5.2
365% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 459
9% 459 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET2311I Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2311I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback