Asrock B660M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B660M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 172
2-Core 348
109% 204 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 935
92% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Nvidia(10DE 1455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 250
Parallax 287
228% 272 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 229
Splatting 172
189% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$54
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,382
Write 1,611
Mixed 235
307% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 91.4
336% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 331
412% 718 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
59GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.9
Write 19.2
Mixed 7.7
20% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.5
219% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 38.4
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 29.8
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B660M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B660M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback