HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 91
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 292
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T600
Legend(17AA 1488) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 31.9
27% 34.7 fps
MRender 49.5
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 28.1
28% 36 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 69 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 393
Write 87.7
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 71
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 17.8
78% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 67.3
DQ Mixed 96.1
86% 134 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback