Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 06:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 200
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 297
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 10.8
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 14
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 207 211 222 222 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 886
Mixed 974
SusWrite 240
191% 859 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 62.8
244% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 566
448% 622 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 171%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 14.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_R565EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback