Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 04:55
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 56
2-Core 78.4
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 81.5
8-Core 81.8
11% 81.7 Pts
64-Core 79.5
5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 2.4
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 290
Mixed 263
50% 219 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 21.2
52% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 88
84% 134 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
771GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,766
Write 1.7
Mixed 81.6
682% 950 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.8
Write 8.7
Mixed 9
16% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
147% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-DS2 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback