Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-43  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Sake_CA
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 23:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 111
46% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 400
36% 303 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1537) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 31.4
20% 24.8 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 21.1
17% 20.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 812 273 279 291 292 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 975
Write 1,027
Mixed 938
SusWrite 373
186% 828 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 29.3
92% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 291
246% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-43 Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback