Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 126
54% 89 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 287
31% 246 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7700M
HP(103C 176C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X100 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.06.06
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 290
Mixed 173
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 26.1
93% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 136
130% 207 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 91%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
466GB free
Firmware: GH2OA3C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 126
Mixed 29.4
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 14.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback